Themes from 2
Corinthians
The Law of Witnesses
2 Cor 13:1-10
The Law of witnesses is an important
concept taken into the life of Israel from general revelation or natural law
and used for the good of the nation. The law is taken by the prophets to be used
sparingly throughout the old testament life of God's ancient people. Then it is
taken into the New Testament in the gospels and epistles. Again, it shows that
the apostles did not see a radical break between the Law and laws of the old
economy and the New Covenant. The Apostles were not afraid to borrow from those
sources in order to have some sort of order in their own society.
The
Law of Witnesses is one of the most practical regulations, not only in the
scriptures, but in the world of law. Many rules of evidence--even for modern
trials--go back to the simple principle
of "The more witnesses, the better the evidence ought to be."
The exception being false witnesses. But, in the wisdom of, and many wise men
from common grace in other cultures, there were ways of dealing with that as
well.
My
hope is to survey the biblical material that establishes this law, and then to
see how it is used in the scriptures via an overview of the material and then
to look at the new application of the law by Paul in 2Cor 13. Then, as time
allows, I want to apply the law to church life in this age.
1.
The Biblical Establishment
2.
The Overview in Scripture
3.
The New Application in 2Cor 13
4.
Application in the Church today
Let's
start at our first point:
1.
The Biblical Establishment
Just
like the tithe, the Law of Witnesses appears in a lot of the societies of the
ancient world. Once we realize what it is and its use, it will make sense that
many of the wise among all the people of the world figured this out. The Law of
witnesses is really just good common sense. Many people use it without even
thinking about it. Parents in large families often find it helpful when dealing
with their children. It just makes good sense that the testimony of multiple truth-telling
witnesses is more certain that the testimony of one--especially where the
testimony of many--read at least two or three, agrees.
In
the book of Deuteronomy, whose name means the second giving of the Law, we find
the law of witnesses established in Israel. It is in chapters 17 and 19.
- Deut 17:6 On the evidence of two witnesses or of three witnesses the one who is to die shall be put to death; a person shall not be put to death on the evidence of one witness.
- Deut 19:15 "A single witness shall not suffice against a person for any crime or for any wrong in connection with any offense that he has committed. Only on the evidence of two witnesses or of three witnesses shall a charge be established.
Numbers--35:30--death
and Exodus 20:16 not bear false witness.
In
the Old Testament it has a very narrow meaning and these principles have a very
narrow, but necessary, application.
In
the New, the use of the Law is expanded from the letter of the Law to the
Spirit of it--2 Cor 3:3, 6. When we go to the New, our expectations ought to be
that we will see this. Adultery is expanded to what goes on in the mind. Anger
in the heart is murder. Coveteousness is theft, and so on. Yet, even in the Old
economy, the use of the law generally, is being slowly enlarged beyond capital
offenses.
A
good legal system assured a more civil and just society. For death penalty
cases, the Law required multiple witnesses. Someone was not to be put to death
on the testimony of a single witness.
2.
The Overview in Scripture
There
are many places we could go, but I want to mention two using them as witnesses
for the doctrine. One is negative and the other is more positive.
Please
turn to 1 Kings 21. This narrative shows that many in Israel had a familiarity
with the Law of Witnesses. In this passage, we find it being misused in order
to steal a vineyard for King Ahab. The setup of false witnesses is found in
verses 10 & 13.
1Kings 21: 1 Now Naboth the
Jezreelite had a vineyard in Jezreel, beside the palace of Ahab king of
Samaria.
2 And after this Ahab said to
Naboth, "Give me your vineyard, that I may have it for a vegetable
garden, because it is near my house, and I will give you a better vineyard for
it; or, if it seems good to you, I will give you its value in
money."
3But Naboth said to Ahab, "The LORD
forbid that I should give you the inheritance of my fathers."
4 And Ahab went into his house vexed
and sullen because of what Naboth the Jezreelite had said to him, for he had
said, "I will not give you the inheritance of my fathers." And he lay
down on his bed and turned away his face and would eat no food.
5 But Jezebel his wife came to him and said to
him, "Why is your spirit so vexed that you eat no food?"
6 And he said to her, "Because I
spoke to Naboth the Jezreelite and said to him, 'Give me your vineyard for
money, or else, if it please you, I will give you another vineyard for it.' And
he answered, 'I will not give you my vineyard.'"
7 And Jezebel his wife said to him,
"Do you now govern Israel? Arise and eat bread and let your heart be
cheerful; I will give you the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite."
8 So she wrote letters in Ahab's name and
sealed them with his seal, and she sent the letters to the elders and the
leaders who lived with Naboth in his city.
9 And she wrote in the letters,
"Proclaim a fast, and set Naboth at the head of the people. 10 And
set two worthless men opposite him, and let them bring a charge against him,
saying, 'You have cursed God and the king.' Then take him out and
stone him to death."
11 And the men of his city, the elders
and the leaders who lived in his city, did as Jezebel had sent word to them. As
it was written in the letters that she had sent to them, 12 they
proclaimed a fast and set Naboth at the head of the people.
13 And the two worthless men came in and
sat opposite him. And the worthless men brought a charge against Naboth in the
presence of the people, saying, "Naboth cursed God and the king." So
they took him outside the city and stoned him to death with stones.
On the word of two
witnesses let every word be established. Yet, in this case, they were a set up
of false witnesses. Two men described as worthless or dispensible. If somehow
they were caught, their fate would be what they sought for Naboth.
14 Then they sent to Jezebel, saying,
"Naboth has been stoned; he is dead." 15As soon as
Jezebel heard that Naboth had been stoned and was dead, Jezebel said to Ahab,
"Arise, take possession of the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite, which he
refused to give you for money, for Naboth is not alive, but dead."
16And as soon as Ahab heard that Naboth was
dead, Ahab arose to go down to the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite, to take
possession of it.
The
other passage is in the New and one that is more familiar. It is Matthew
18:12-20: This is the passage that deals with one of the processes of church discipline. It is not
the only one--there is a more direct route for issues affecting the church's
organization or administration.
Matt 18: 16 But if he does
not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every charge may be
established by the evidence of two or three witnesses.
Jesus
uses this principle right out of the Law for the good of the church. Again, the
Law has much that is relevant for the church's life in doctrine and practice.
Is
it possible for people in a church to give false witness?
Yes,
it is. Many years ago, two young men had a fight in our parking lot. Nobody saw
it start. They only were drawn to it after it began. SO, the witnesses were no
help as to who was at fault. A woman told her daughter to say what happened.
The woman told me what her daughter said and instructed me not to talk to her
daughter about it. I wasn't about to obey her. The next week I gently asked the
daughter about the start of the fight after explaining to her that God knew all
she was thinking and would say. She immediately broke down and confessed she
did not see the start of the fight and that her mother told her what to say.
When the mother confronted me about talking to her daughter, I asked her about
setting her daughter up as a false witness and how terrible that was. They
didn't last too long.
When
believers tell the truth, it is a beautiful thing. The one brought before the
church, if it gets that far, is ready to repent. I say if it gets that far
because if the person offending repents after being interviewed in front of two
or three, there is no need to go any further. A few years ago now, there were
about four cases all in a row where people repented after being confronted by
one or before many members as witnesses. The matters were dropped. Two had to
do with falsehood, one had to do with sexual impurity and the other had to do
with dishonoring parents and other authorities. I would have thought people
would be happy that the cases did not have to go further. But, people who love
gossip and love to gossip, were offended at me for not carrying the matters
forward to the church as a whole. I told them to do so would be sin on my part.
They wanted to know things they were not entitled to know. And, that sinful
curiosity affected the church adversely much more than the original sins ever
did.
So,
the use of this principle is important to protect the integrity of the church
and sinners who repent in a timely manner after being lovingly confronted by a
brother or sister. And, remember, the process of church discipline is designed
to only be as public as needed, especially when those times when Matt 18 is
being followed. Multiple witnesses are better because they can establish every
word. Witnesses keep others from overstating or even understating what has gone
on.
3.
The New Application in 2Cor 13
2 Cor 13:1-10 This is the third time I am coming to
you. Every charge must be established by the evidence of two or three
witnesses.
The language at the
end of the verse shows us what he means at the beginning of the verse. Paul is
seeking to establish something in the present to write about or something in
the present that he wants to confront someone about. He is being a faithful
minister for their good.
2 I warned those who sinned before and all the others,
and I warn them now while absent, as I did when present on my second visit,
that if I come again I will not spare them--
Do you see the three
different senses of the language that matches The use of the Law of Witnesses?
The First: I warned
those who sinned before, and all the others.
Presumably they were warned either in
person or through a letter sent to the church. Yet, there does not appear to be
repentance in line with Pail's warning.
Paul does not carry on
about the sin. They must know what it is. Paul is acting on the sin and their
knowledge of it.
The Second: And I warn
them now while absent, as I did when present on my second visit. This letter is
a second admonition to them to repent of whatever sin they or a number of them
had committed or were still committing.
This epistle served
the purpose of a second witness against them based on Paul's personal knowledge
of them.
The Third: that if
I come again I will not spare them-- That is if they do not repent of
whatever sin they were guilty of.
Paul uses himself as a
witness three times. Two are based on the past and present and the third is
based on what he expects to find on his next visit. Paul is willing to be the
three witnesses needed to act. This was a serious matter to the Apostle and
should have been to the church. Instead, at least some formed the idea that
Jesus wasn't really speaking through Paul. SO he counters:
3b 3 since
you seek proof that Christ is speaking in me. He is not weak in dealing
with you, but is powerful among you. 4 For he was
crucified in weakness, but lives by the power of God.
Some look at the rag
tag apostolic band and think they don't look like much. There is nothing
extraordinary about them. There is no show of power when they come. Those in
the church who thought that way were mistaken. There is great strength in
weakness when dealing with spiritual matters.
As Jesus was strong in
weakness, so to the Apostles…
4b For we also
are weak in him, but in dealing with you we will live with him by the
power of God.
So based on their
weakness showing the power of Jesus, Paul wants them to do two things that are
similar…
5 Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the
faith. Test yourselves. Or do you not realize this about yourselves,
that Jesus Christ is in you?--unless indeed you fail to meet the test! 6 I
hope you will find out that we have not failed the test.
Give yourselves a
thorough-going examination to discern are you in the faith--are you really true
believers when you examine yourself in the bright light of what you have been
taught and the realization that God knows all things. Then, continue to give
yourselves a series of tests to continue to discern and check up on your exam
answer to see if it is true. Don't stop testing yourselves. Never stop testing
yourself. And, when you test yourself be an honest witness against yourself if
need be.
There will be some who
apply all of this to the Apostles and will turn it all around on them--people
do that when they don't like what you have to say.
7 But we pray to God that you may not do wrong--not that we
may appear to have met the test, but that you may do what is right, though we
may seem to have failed. 8 For we cannot do anything against
the truth, but only for the truth. 9 For we are glad
when we are weak and you are strong. Your restoration is what we pray
for.
Any process used to
confront sin is aimed at restoration in a couple of ways. 1. To restore
someone's understanding of events to the true understanding of them; 2. To rid
falsehood from testimony given; 3. To encourage purity in the life of the
church.
10 For this reason I write these things while I am away from
you, that when I come I may not have to be severe in my use
of the authority that the Lord has given me for building up and not for
tearing down.
4.
Application in the Church today
Paul and no minister
of the gospel who seeks to follow the example of Jesus wants to have to deal
strongly with people. Yet, they have the authority to do so. The Authority of
the Apostles passed to the elders/pastors/overseers in the churches up their
deaths. The latter was intended to be in perpetuity. Even a number of the
Apostles are called overseers or elders in the New Testament. Even in their
time, they were less and less acting like apostles and more and more like
ministers or elders.
It is not the pastors
job to be the social coordinator or to make social calls in person or on the
phone. His job is primarily to pray and to preach. That is the main way his
rule is exercised. He tells God's people what God has said and what it means. And,
then in his secret place he prayers for your spiritual good.
So, be careful what
you say and how you live. When all is
said and done what will the witnesses say about you if they are ever called
together?
What will they say
about you? What will the unbelievers who know you say? What will God say in the
judgment? That is the most important question to use as you give yourself a
gospel examination. Mmay the Lord give you the grace to do it and judgment day
honesty when it comes to your faith--are you in it or not? Amen
The ministry is for
building up, not for tearing down. But, at times, both are needed if men in
leadership positions are going to be faithful to the Lord, the shepherd of the
church who in giving gifts to the church in captivity gave them pastor/teachers
in the church for our time
No comments:
Post a Comment