Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Glory of Jesus I The Infamous Rebuke of Peter, or, why Peter was not made the Pope in Matt 16.



Glory of Jesus I

Peter’s Infamous Rebuke

Matt 16:21-26

In Matthew 16:16 we find Peter’s words of settled conviction  as an answer to Jesus’ question to the disciples, But who do you say that I, the son of man, am?, Peter replied, “You are the Christ, the son of the living God.”

What is implicit in these words, is that the disciples had come to see the true nature of Jesus messianic role and identity. Jesus asked the question using the veiled messianic reference, the son of man. Peter answered using the words, “Christ” that was packed with political meaning among the population of the day and Son of God showing his origin and something of his work.

A messiah had long been expected by the religious in Israel. False messiahs had appeared many times, but the common expectation among the Jews of the first century was for a messianic figure who would prove himself to be a political liberator and power.  Even the Saducees had an idea of a physical political entity that would be ruled by Messiah forever. This liberator would throw off the cloak of all authority and lead the Jewish nation into world prominence and domination in a golden messianic age that would last forever. It would grow into a time and place of blessedness called heaven. Today, this view is called Zionism.

The Jews were not looking for a spiritual kingdom with a spiritual ethos about it--their hopes were for a material kingdom with a physical presence and dominion. Therefore, the use of the humble term son of man, was preferred by Jesus as he saw himself as the anointed messiah. Son of man was an obscure reference to the one who would fulfill the true messianic mission. The term, Christ, or anointed one had political overtones in the minds of the masses. 

It is this difference in perspective and expectation between the Jews of Jesus’ day and the true and only messiah that is at the heart of Jesus’ instruction to his disciples in Verse 20 of Matthew 16. 

[For extemporaneous exposition as to why Peter isn't the Pope based on this passage, see this message at http://www.sermonaudio.com. ]



Let’s read the text of Matt 16 from v. 20 through v. 26. Under these headings:

1. Why Silence?
2. A New Focus to the Teaching Ministry
3. Peter’s First Attempt at Binding and Loosing
4. Jesus Rebukes the Rebuker
5. The Cost of Following the Christ

Let’s read the text:

1. Why Silence?
Matt. 16:20 Then He commanded His disciples that they should tell no one that He was Jesus the Christ.

2. A New Focus to the Teaching Ministry
Matt. 16:21 From that time Jesus began to show to His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised the third day. 

3. Peter’s First Attempt at Binding and Loosing
22 Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, saying,  “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!”

4. Jesus Rebukes the Rebuker
23 But He turned and said to Peter,  “Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.”

5. The Cost of Following the Christ
Matt. 16:24 Then Jesus said to His disciples,  “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me.  25  “For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it.  26  “For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 

Let’s look at the text more closely:

1. Why Silence?
Matt. 16:20 Then He commanded His disciples that they should tell no one that He was Jesus the Christ.

Jesus did not tell his disciples to not tell because he did not know he was the anointed messiah of God. Jesus was not promoting what liberalism has called, “The Messianic Secret”. The command for silence was given because this title, Christ, would have been misunderstood.

His miracles and mission had already been misunderstood after feeding the 5,000. The multitudes wanted to make him king--on their terms, not on the terms of a true understanding of who Jesus was.

Peter had professed Jesus true identity--they had come to understand that Jesus was the Christ, and that his kingdom was vastly different that what they had once thought. They had come to know, that Jesus was THE Christ, the Son of the Living God. The confession in John 6 and Matthew 16 is devoid of the misperception common among the Jews of the first century. It is full of truth.

Since the Disciples had finally understood who Jesus was and the mission he was on, it was time to bring them deeper in their understanding of what he must do.  They knew he was the messiah and the son of the living God, but there was so much more.

Jesus accommodates this knowledge to the disciples incrementally. He brings them to a point of understanding of foundational truths, then he opens up new and necessary doctrines that are based on what he has previously said.

Therefore, here we have ....

2. A New Focus to the Teaching Ministry

There are basic elements of his future ministry and mission that Jesus is going to introduce to the disciples.

—They are:
—Travel to Jerusalem—the Holy City where the Temple was
—Suffering at the hands of the elders, chief priests and scribes
—Being Killed
—& Be Raised from the dead—a point often forgotten or lost upon the disciples.

This is what Matthew tells us as the explicit items on Jesus’ agenda as he makes these five items the main focus in his teaching ministry to the disciples. They are ready to start hearing these things. Repeat: they are ready to start hearing these things. But, if you know the Gospels, it takes them a long time for the truthfulness and the ramifications of the truth to sink in. The needed to learn about the coming work of redemption the messiah must accomplish. Many were still thinking of a material Kingdom, rather than a spiritual one.

This is what Matthew wrote:

Matt. 16:21 From that time Jesus began to show to His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised the third day. 

Jesus was just beginning to show these things to his disciples. Yet, the general theme of suffering at the hands of the Jewish leaders and about his own passion and resurrection had already been stated in a veiled manner.

Turn over to John Chapter 2 for a moment. This is where we find Jesus cleansing the temple at the beginning of his ministry. After driving out the moneychangers, he is asked a few questions. We pick up the narrative in Verse 18.  Where we have an interesting and informative contrast between the spirituality of Jesus perceptions and the physical perceptions of those who witnessed his action.

John 2:18-22 18 So the Jews answered and said to Him,  “What sign do You show to us, since You do these things?”  19 Jesus answered and said to them,  “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.”

What is Jesus talking about? What do the Jews think Jesus is talking about? Let’s read further--

20 Then the Jews said,  “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will You raise it up in three days?”

They were thinking of the physical temple. But as Verse 21 tells us,

21 But [Jesus] was speaking of the temple of His body. 

The effect of all this was future.  John adds,

22 Therefore, when He had risen from the dead, His disciples remembered that He had said this to them; and they believed the Scripture and the word which Jesus had said.

When did the disciples finally believe what Jesus had taught at the beginning of his ministry? After the resurrection, after the events occurred they looked back and said, “That’s what he meant....” The resurrection was important for many reasons.

Back in Matthew 16:21 we are told from this point onward, Jesus taught about these things. Implicitly, Jesus is teaching them that there was not going to be the grand and glorious fulfillment of the mistaken hopes of the Jews for a physical and eternal reign of the messiah on the earth. His kingdom would be pursued in a much different manner--a spiritual means to its own glorious ends.

The word must is used to show these elements are necessary in order to complete his messianic mission as it had been given to him by his Father, the Living God.

Note to the reference to going to Jerusalem. The Jewish mafia had already been sending agents to Galilee to hear what he had to say and to keep track of him. They had already sought to kill him. The only thing that kept them from acting on this was their fear of the multitudes who also went wherever Jesus went. Jesus is telling them that he must at some point return to the most hostile place on earth in order to accomplish the work he had been given to do.

Jesus was utterly committed to his mission in order to complete the work his Father had given him to do. A work that in many places and in many ways had already been revealed in prophetic utterances of old.

The Death of Jesus was fixed--it was absolutely essential to accomplish the redemption of his people.

This news was too much for at least one of the disciples--the man who had recently given the confession on which these great truths could be taught, Peter.  The narrative that follows his great confession and Jesus words about that great confession finds Peter being anything but steadfast to the words he spoke saying, You are the Christ, the son of the living God.

Look at V 22 where we have....

3. Peter’s First Attempt at Binding and Loosing
22 Then Peter took Him aside

At least Peter had the decency to make this a private matter. He took Jesus aside in order to speak with him. Look at what follows--

and began to rebuke Him,

Peter began to contradict what Jesus, the Christ, the son of the living God had said. Implicitly, Peter thought Jesus was WRONG. This word for contradict is a strong word. It means to either command or to denounce one for error or sin.

This is what Jesus did to the wind and sea when he stilled them both. This is what Jesus did to demons when he cast them out. This is what Jesus’ did to the fever when he healed Simon Peter’s mother-in-law. This is the word used when Jesus commands in order to contradict a present state of affairs and to denounce the works and workers of darkness. And, this is what Peter did to his Lord shortly after his great confession.

It is not that Peter is making a little suggestion to Jesus or asking Jesus, “Are you absolutely sure it must be this way?” No, Peter was contradicting Jesus, seeking to get him to change what must Jesus said must happen--It is an explicit denunciation of Jesus’ words of what was necessary for his divine mission.  And this is what he said....

saying,  “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!”

Peter speaks with certainty; Peter is mistaken. He says, let these things be far away from your experience Lord. One lexicon explains the language “Far be it from you, Lord” with these words: “a highly elliptical expression equivalent in meaning to the statement ‘may God be merciful to you in sparing you from having to undergo some experience’ with force: ‘God forbid it, may it not happen” The presence of both forms of the particle for “no” or “not” shows Peter could not imagine any circumstance where these things should be allowed to happen. He even uses a word from the word family of propitiation to convey the strength of his words--May God be appeased and remove this thing from you. Anyway I look at it, these things cannot be allowed to happen.

Peter is fighting against the eternal purpose and absolute necessity of the work of Christ in his life and death. He doesn’t know that, yet. But at this time he wants there to be some other way. The text says, began to rebuke him. As Jesus had begun to teach the necessity of these things, Peter sought to counteract them with equal or greater force.

Have you ever not liked something God brought to pass in your life? Have you ever grumbled at his providence? Have you ever been enraged by your situation so that you were tempted to rebuke God?

People do this all the time. They get angry at unforeseen providences that cramp their style or their schedule or that go against what they had planned. In reality, what comes to pass is the very best for our good and for God’s glory. He knows what we need. He has said all things will work together for good for those who are the Called.

But, let’s go a bit further in our probing--have you ever read your Bible and come across something you didn’t like? What did you do? Dismiss it? Think simply that can’t be true and keep on reading? As you meditate on the Word have you ever found yourself thinking or saying, Lord, this cannot be? And the only reason it cannot be is not that God hasn’t said it, but merely because you don't like it?

These comments or thoughts against God’s providences and his Word are rebukes of God at worst and murmurings and complainings at best. Either way they are sins. In my assessment, most of them are implicit rebukes of God or his servants in order for people to justify their own private interpretations. People change their understanding of God to accommodate their own errors.

The Scriptures and their interpretation is given to the Church as a corporate entity and not to any individually. Like Peter, when individuals act on their own, they are in great danger of unknowingly contradicting God. That is a dangerous place to be. And that is exactly where we find Peter in Matthew 16.  Peter is like some of us who think we know better than God. Peter thinks he knows better than God incarnate. The one he has witnessed doing marvel-filled works and speaking the wonderful words of life. The one to whom he said, “You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God.”

Jesus takes an opportunity to answer starting with some fitly spoken words.....

4. Jesus Rebukes the Real Rebuker
23 But He turned and said to Peter,  “Get behind Me, Satan!

Where there is some question in some minds about whether Peter is the “rock” or even a “rock” in an earlier narrative, there is no question here about who is called, Satan, it is Peter. And, it is not simply what Satan signifies, Jesus uses the vocative case as he views Peter as if he were Satan in the flesh before him. The meek and mild Lord, Jesus calls Peter, “Satan.”

Put yourself in Peter’s shoes. I’m sure he believed he was right, sincere and doing what he thought was the right thing to do. But, Peter was dead wrong--he had misperceived the situation and acted in undiscerning haste, again. Therefore Jesus gives the counter-rebuke, rebuking his rebuker, with the words, “Get outta here, Satan.” If you pardon my rather free translation. But, that it about the force and meaning of it.

The verb translated “Get behind me” is a command to Peter to get out of his presence.

Jesus views this situation as he did the temptation in the Wilderness back towards the start of his ministry. Turn back to Chapter 4 for a minute.

In Matt 4:1-11 we have the temptations of Jesus after he had fasted for many days. The Devil came to tempt him. Jesus rebuked him with the word of God and eventually said to him in Verse 4:10, Then Jesus said to him,  “Away with you, Satan!  It is the same verb as we find in Matthew 16:23 where Jesus commands Satan to get away from him. It is strong language that can’t be softened.

What was Peter’s problem? It seems that he picked up on the suffering and death part of the teaching, but not on the triumph of the resurrection. He became obsessed with a part of what Jesus had begun to teach and had not placed it in the context of the entirety of Jesus’ teaching.

Peter needs the benefit of the doubt. He thought he was doing what was right. But, he was dead wrong. I am sure he was concerned for truth--but in it he was guilty of great error. I am sure he was sincere, but he was sincerely wrong in his rebuke of the Lord Jesus, the Christ, the Son of the Living God.

It is not loving God with all our mind. And as they are spoken to others, they have the capacity to lead others astray. That is why it was a good thing for Peter to take Jesus aside when he sought to rebuke him.

Additionally, sincerity is not a saving grace--people can be sincere about something and sincerely wrong at the same time. Look at Mormonism, Jehovah’s Witnessism, Roman Catholicism, etc. Etc. Etc. All isms have sincere adherents who are all sincerely wrong as they pursue a salvation by works to some degree.

People like that can actually do the work of the devil as they think in their heart of hearts that they are right. There are many Peter’s in our day who refuse to bow the knee to what God has truly said as his whole counsel is taught and proclaimed. It is only made worse by the spirit of individualism present in our day.

You see, there is safety in knowing the Word of God and doing the Word of God in an unadulterated manner. It is a blessing to be taught by those God has gifted and called. Those who God will call to account for what they have taught.

Let’s get back to the text....

Jesus continues:

You are an offense to Me,

Jesus is scandalized by what Peter said and did. Peter is wrong. Peter isn’t being very steadfast and rock-solid is he?  Jesus saw Peter as having sinned against him. And by the stinging rebuke we know Jesus wants him far from him, if he is going to be like that, I should say like Satan.

Jesus continued:

for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.”

Peter came to know he was the Christ, but he was still thinking like the multitude, the scribes, the Pharisees, and the Chief Priests. He was concerned with the physical, what was seen, what he could feel with his hands or with his emotions. This left a void in his mind so that he did not have his mind full of the thoughts of God, but the concerns of men.

How many times do we take the things of God and only superficially apply them to the outward aspects of our life, when they should inform the inner man that we may be changed from glory to glory? It happens all the time.

People get concerned or obsessed with their own views on many matters, or being heard, or being right, no matter what anyone else says. Many do this with the same motivations of Peter--they are right in their own eyes, they think these things are important enough to rebuke, or to instruct others about these things while thinking themselves to be right, and they add to that the sincerity they have in doing it--but in the end, the tragedy is that they will be shown to have been like the twin rebukers Peter, and Satan, rather than like Jesus.

Being like Christ, as one of his committed followers comes with a cost. And, that cost is what some find offensive. It is a cost where we suspend our own rites on matters of faith and practice in order to take up those that are Jesus’. Thank God that he has revealed himself in the incarnate Word and since he has ascended to heaven his written Word and with that Word given teachers to the Churches to instruct with the Word of God as it “is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness...” As the Spirit says in 2 Tim 3:16.

Jesus then tells Peter and the others who were in close proximity....

5. The Cost of Following the Christ
Matt. 16:24 Then Jesus said to His disciples,  “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me.  25  “For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it.  26  “For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 

We touch upon this theme of following Jesus once again. Following Jesus does not entitle anyone to their own pride-filled private interpretation of him or the events surrounding him as Peter tried to do. Following Jesus is to be humble and to come after him, denying oneself. This is perhaps the hardest thing we are called to do as disciples. We are not on our own path to God--we are on His Straight and Narrow way. We can’t make things up as we go along--we must take his directions as our own.

You see, where pride manifests itself, we know at that point, the one with pride is not following as they ought.

We need to be taught the whole counsel of God in order to be mindful of the things of God, so that we can follow him by faith. In the great commission Jesus commands his Apostles to teach all that he had commanded. Those are the things that are to be taught to the Churches. Jesus likens discipleship to taking up one’s cross in order to follow him.

Jesus has only started teaching the disciples about his death. When these words were spoken they did not know the richness of the metaphor of taking up the cross. They did not realize at that time Jesus was telling them that following him may mean their own death in a number of ways.  

1. Their own death to their own aspirations and desires in order to take up the purposes of God in all areas of this life.

2. Their own death to their ideas about Jesus, his life and his work in order to conform their thoughts to the truth about Jesus as he revealed it.

3. Their own death as they stand committed to him, no matter what, their own death even to crucifixion on a Roman cross.

Jesus said,

25  “For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it. 

What do you desire? To assert yourself, your ideas, agenda, means to an end, rites to your own opinions and whatever you are truly sincere about? Do you stand ever-ready to rebuke God’s ways or his Word?

Or will you lay even those things at the feet of Jesus to follow him according to his Word in all humility--no matter what humans may throw at you?

Only those who lose their life for His cause will truly find it.

Jesus asks Peter two important questions:

A. 26  “For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?

B. Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 

The soul of man is the thing of greatest value to God. The answers are simple, obvious and profound:

A. 26  “For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?

It would be of no profit to acquire everything you want in this life only to discover how wrong you have been at the judgment.

B. Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 

There is nothing a man can give for his soul. He cannot even acquire all the wealth of all the nations and trade it in for his soul’s rest.

What do you value? Jesus is God’s priceless treasure. To provide security for our lost and dying souls each and every man must have faith in Jesus, who is the anointed of God, the Christ, the Son of the Living God. 

Trust in him. Listen to his gentle instruction as it is revealed in his Word and that Word as it is proclaimed from faithful pulpits. That is the means God has ordained to accomplish his abiding purpose to seek and to save the last. May these words be used even today to comfort the saints and to call sinners to repentance.

Seek and Save XI The Syro-Phoenician Woman



Seek and Save XI



The Syro-Phoenician Woman 

Mark 7:24ff


This morning, in our study of the how Jesus came to seek and to save the lost, we come to Mark 7:24-37. Here we find two miracles: the first for the daughter of a persistent Syro-Phoenician woman, a woman outside of Israel; and the second towards an inhabitant of the region of Decapolis, east of the Sea of Galilee, a region with a mixture of Jews and Greeks.

Both of these miracles teach us about the Lord in different ways. The first, he tests the faith and desire of the woman coming to him. In the second, it is not the miracle that surprises us, but what I find intriguing is the instruction of Jesus that followed and the response of the multitude to Jesus’ command.

Let’s read the text of Mark 7 starting at Verse 24:

The Syro-Phoenician Woman

1. A Word of Direction and Desire
Mark 7:24 From there He arose and went to the region of Tyre and Sidon. And He entered a house and wanted no one to know it, but He could not be hidden. 

2. The Diversion
25 For a woman whose young daughter had an unclean spirit heard about Him, and she came and fell at His feet.

3. The Description
26 The woman was a Greek, a Syro-Phoenician by birth, and she kept asking Him to cast the demon out of her daughter. 

4. The Challenging Reply
27 But Jesus said to her,  “Let the children be filled first, for it is not good to take the children’s bread and throw it to the little dogs.”

5. A Response of Faith
28 And she answered and said to Him,  “Yes, Lord, yet even the little dogs under the table eat from the children’s crumbs.”

6. The Act of Mercy
29 Then He said to her,  “For this saying go your way; the demon has gone out of your daughter.”  30 And when she had come to her house, she found the demon gone out, and her daughter lying on the bed.

The Healing in Decapolis and Instruction that followed

1. A Word of Setting
Mark 7:31 Again, departing from the region of Tyre and Sidon, He came through the midst of the region of Decapolis to the Sea of Galilee. 

2. A Miracle Sought
32 Then they brought to Him one who was deaf and had an impediment in his speech, and they begged Him to put His hand on him. 

3. A Miracle Granted
33 And He took him aside from the multitude, and put His fingers in his ears, and He spat and touched his tongue.  34 Then, looking up to heaven, He sighed, and said to him,  “Ephphatha,” that is,  “Be opened.”  35 Immediately his ears were opened, and the impediment of his tongue was loosed, and he spoke plainly. 

4. A Divine Desire
36 Then He commanded them that they should tell no one; but the more He commanded them, the more widely they proclaimed it. 

5. A Word of Wonder
37 And they were astonished beyond measure, saying,  “He has done all things well. He makes both the deaf to hear and the mute to speak.”

Let’s look a bit closer at the text:

The Syro-phoenician Woman

1. A Word of Direction and Desire
Mark 7:24 From there He arose and went to the region of Tyre and Sidon.

Jesus was somewhere in Galilee. We know that because the scribes and Pharisees had traveled from Jerusalem to hear Jesus in Galilee earlier in this chapter.

Jesus had a mission. There was a particular need over by the Coast and a little north that needed his attention.

It was not a coincidence that Jesus traveled there from Galilee. There was something to do and this was the appointed time to do it. So, Jesus, the Disciples and maybe a small sampling of the multitude made the trek by foot to be near the borders of Tyre and Sidon. From the city of Capernaum, Tyre was about 33 miles and Sidon about 45. To reach the Southern stretch of their region, or borders, it would have been about a 30 mile journey, as the crow flies. But, the way to get there was over the rugged mountain complex. It would not have been an easy trip. However, there was work to do and an appointed time in which to do it.

When Jesus arrived, Mark tells us....

And He entered a house

This is the normal activity of one who has just traversed the mountains as he walked to this region.  His entrance to the house however, came with a desire of Jesus.

Mark tells us...

and wanted no one to know it,

For some unknown reason, Jesus did not want everyone or anyone to know that he was in the region and in the house. Jesus knew what he was doing, where he needed to go and why he did not want his presence disclosed. Jesus was staying mostly in Galilee now because the Jews sought to kill him?

The Pharisees and scribes were afraid to act against Jesus out of fear for the multitudes?

Tyre and Sidon were far away from both of these groups. He was away from the presence of the religious elite in Judea and far away from the protective function of the multitudes. Jesus was out of his normal element, humanly speaking, that is.

Perhaps the area of Tyre and Sidon presented a new danger or set of troublesome difficulties for the Lord Jesus Christ. He is out there by the Coast, in Roman ruled areas, where the natural protection of the crowd was gone. As Jesus had become cautious about preserving his life in Judea, perhaps also here.

But, Mark adds a curious phrase.

but He could not be hidden.  Apparently, not wanting anyone to know he was there was a desire to be hidden. To be in that place stealthily. But, the personal desire of Jesus according to his human nature was not to be. The presence of the Lord Jesus Christ was too great a thing for the region. He could not be hidden.

What does this entail?  Knowledge of Jesus had spread outside of the nation Israel. But, it was not just a mere knowledge of Jesus, but knowledge that made curiosity well up in the people even in the region of Tyre and Sidon. Jesus was well-known in the lands that were away from his ordinary places of ministry. Not only Israel was a buzz with what Jesus was doing and had done, the regions outside of Israel had heard of him too. This is important. Remember it. Because of....

2. The Diversion
25 For a woman whose young daughter had an unclean spirit heard about Him, and she came and fell at His feet.

How did this woman hear about Jesus? Verse 26 tells us of her ethnic origin--she was not an inhabitant of Israel. But, we will get there in a minute.  This only shows how thoroughly some outside of the boundaries of Israel had heard rightly of Jesus.

But, here we need to note what she had and then what she did. She had a daughter who had an unclean spirit. Even in Tyre and Sidon the spirits were stirred up and active during the ministry of Jesus. Yet, their presence on the fringe of Israel was not enough to keep them safe from the conquering power of the Lord Jesus Christ.

This woman had heard of Jesus, knew of her daughter’s need and she came to Jesus and fell at his feet.

This may appear somewhat ordinary. But this woman would not have known about proper worship due to the Lord Jesus Christ. In an act of homage and worship she falls at his feet in submission seeking help as a subject would fall before their king seeking some grace from their monarch. She falls before Jesus as a subject before royalty. After all, Jesus was a king whether this woman knew it or not. She treats Him properly.

Let’s see ...

3. The Description of her identity
26 The woman was a Greek, a Syro-Phoenician by birth,

This woman was a non-Jew. That is basically what Greek means in the language of the New Testament. The Jewish view of the world at that time was Israel are Jews and everybody else is Greek. Everywhere else in the Mediterranean region people generally spoke common Greek, and some Latin in the upper levels of society. It was a Hellenistic or Greek-like civilization Jesus ministered to. Everyone outside of Israel was considered a Greek. There were two types of people in the world even then--the Jews and everybody who wished they were, were called Greeks or its synonym, Gentiles.

Mark goes on to tell us something further about this woman. She was Syro-Phoenician by birth. That means she was from the region North of Israel that went from the Mediterranean Sea East through Syria. She had a lineage and heritage that was not Jewish. Mark makes the non-Jewish nature and background of this woman explicit. Because it would not have been normal for her to act as she did.  Look at the text:

and she kept asking Him to cast the demon out of her daughter. 

The original shows continuous action in the past up to the present. When we read, she kept asking Him, it has the force of she asked him constantly from the time she threw herself down at Jesus’ feet. She had not stopped asking Jesus to cast the demon out of her daughter. She was doing what a loving parent without hope should do--plead with the Lord Jesus for the needed grace believing the reports of his kindness and love for people.

To her continuous action, Jesus gives.....

4. The Challenging Reply
27 But Jesus said to her,  “Let the children be filled first, for it is not good to take the children’s bread and throw it to the little dogs.”

This is a parabolic saying. Usually, people don't understand them because they do not have faith. But, unlike what Jesus met throughout Israel, this woman understood exactly what he meant and precisely as soon as he said it.

The children are Israel or perhaps a small remnant of the ever-present multitude who represent the Jews. To take the bread that belongs to them and to give it to the Gentile dogs would not be right. But, the woman had a comeback as a reasonable explanation of what Jesus could do while still feeding the children.  We have....

5. A Response of Faith
28 And she answered and said to Him,  “Yes, Lord, yet even the little dogs under the table eat from the children’s crumbs.”

When you feed children they drop crumbs which the little dogs eat. She was willing to be viewed as one of those dogs if it would get what she sought for her daughter. She was happy with a little, not desiring a lot. She shows her understanding of who Jesus was, that she had no rightful claim to him and his work, she sees her only hope as being in table scraps from the ministry of Jesus.

Jesus, as the one who knows men’s hearts was duly impressed. Therefore we have recorded .... As the speed of life quickens again. We have the record of .....

6. The Act of Mercy
29 Then He said to her,  “For this saying go your way; the demon has gone out of your daughter.”

She showed a little faith in a great messiah even though she was not Jewish.  Jesus isn’t concerned with only one race or ethnic group and their many needs and problems. He was concerned for all. Remember, he had an appointment with this woman that he was bound to keep in order to fulfill the plan and work of God.  Even from the house where he was ”hidden” we see his ability to heal those who were a distance away.

Mark’s concluding words focus on the continued response as the Syro-Phoenician woman returned home....

30 And when she had come to her house, she found the demon gone out, and her daughter lying on the bed.

Then Mark moves quickly to the second miracle without comment or conjunction...We have ....

The Healing in Decapolis and Instruction that followed

1. A Word of Setting
Mark 7:31 Again, departing from the region of Tyre and Sidon, He came through the midst of the region of Decapolis to the Sea of Galilee. 

Jesus headed Easterly and then dropped down southerly to Decapolis. He came into the region that is on the Eastern side of the Sea of Galilee. He was in the midst of that region keeping another divine appointment.

Some unidentified folk knew he was active and present in the region. So as many had in the past.....there was ....

2. A Miracle Sought for one by others
32 Then they brought to Him one who was deaf and had an impediment in his speech,

They brought a hopeless case to Jesus. Not to Jude, or any other disciple. But to Jesus that others might learn his ways and see his power.

This man was unable to hear and spoke in a way that was virtually unrecognizable to the human ear. Those who brought the man acted as the Syro-Phoenician woman had.

The text says:

and they begged Him to put His hand on him. 

The constantly asked Jesus to just put his hand on him and heal him. But, much to our surprise, even though Jesus could heal at a distance without a word, for his own good reasons I am sure, did not do that here. But, he did something not yet recorded in the Gospels. This is how Mark records the .....

3. A Miracle Granted
33 And He took him aside from the multitude,

He moved him away from the multitude that is still present and likely growing. To....

and put His fingers in his ears, and He spat and touched his tongue. 

Why? I do not know! But, Jesus always had good reason for what he did. He does these physical actions on the man: he put his fingers in his ears and Jesus spat on this man’s tongue. That’s right, he opened the man’s mouth and spat on his tongue. Its amazing isn’t it?

Do you know at the time of the Reformation there were still many Catholics who claimed to have vials or small bottles of Jesus’s saliva. And, there were some who sold it as a guaranteed healing potion. The power of Jesus cannot be packaged in a bottle nor in the greatest containers of this world. When he heals, it is complete--the malady is gone totally and finally.

But, before the spittle would take effect, we have another more expected action....

34 Then, looking up to heaven, He sighed, and said to him,

Jesus looked to God and spoke to the deaf man--remember, He is speaking to a man who could not hear at all. And he says to the man in Aramaic....

“Ephphatha,” that is,  “Be opened.”

Jesus commands his ears to action.  Now think about that....Can you open and close your ears at will?  Neither could that man. The verb is passive. In order for the command to be obeyed, this poor man was absolutely dependant on something outside himself to open up his ears that he might hear. What he was dependant upon was the power of the one commanding. Jesus was to give the power needed to obey what he had said.

35 Immediately his ears were opened, and the impediment of his tongue was loosed, and he spoke plainly. 

There were no half miracles with Jesus. He spoke, yea, commanded the man’s ears as only a creator could. His ears and his tongue were healed and those present could easily hear what he had to say.

It must have been a glorious miracle to see. But, being back near Galilee and the boundaries of Israel, Jesus showed due caution again. This was expressed in....

4. A Divine Desire
36 Then He commanded them that they should tell no one;

The command to not tell a soul was no less a command than the command to the tongue and ears to be opened. Yet, Mark tells us....

.... but the more He commanded them, the more widely they proclaimed it.  A wonder-filled thing can’t be contained for long. Yet, they were all guilty of disobedience. There is a time to tell and a time to be silent.

The multitudes hear about a great wonder, yet misuse it to make others curious and themselves guilty of telling others when they should have shown Jesus due respect in the silence he sought.

5. A Word of Wonder
37 And they were astonished beyond measure, saying,  “He has done all things well. He makes both the deaf to hear and the mute to speak.”

Look at the report: the multitudes who witnessed this miracle were amazed beyond description. They were thoroughly amazed. For a time there was nothing else they were aware of other than their amazement.

This wonder came upon them because of the external event. All they could do was to make a statement about the Lord Jesus Christ. They summarized him and his ministry in this way: He has done all things well. It was not just these two miracles, but his feeding of the 5,000, the way he handled his opposers, the way he taught the crowd, there was no offense, no sin, no trangression in all that they had observed Jesus do. His grace and mercy would eclipse any lingering doubt. They were stupified by these miracles. He did for this man what no other could do. There was something extremely special about this man, the Lord Jesus Christ.

Yet, in their astonishment and wonder, the experience they observed could not be kept to themselves.

Why did they continue to tell others? 

Two words: they were astonished, though remaining in unbelief. They were “wowed”, even “dazzled” but their hearts were not conquered to follow Jesus all of their days. Being wowed and dazzled at the Lord Jesus Christ and all he did so well is not the same as following him by faith.

Isn’t this a characteristic of a lot of what goes for modern day Christianity?

We have heard about two miracles Jesus performed. What is your response? A great big WOW as if Jesus was some sort of traveling magic act? Or, is it to fall in humble adoration because this same Jesus is the one who continues to save men’s souls?  He is in heaven at the right hand of God. Yet he is present with his people as they gather together. He can make men whole from wherever he is.

Have you sought him by faith to know the restoration he can bring to a sin-filled and wicked heart? He is still the one to whom all must turn for the forgiveness of sin and the salvation he alone offers.

He is merciful and kind and turns none away who earnestly come--knowing that all who come to him are drawn by His Father in heaven. Is God working on you to repent of your sins and to seek his mercy and Grace? Come while you still can. This is the day of salvation.

For those who are his, we find comfort in Jesus’ ability to act from a distance, in his merciful nature and concern for all and after seeing with the eyes of faith and knowing his grace, that indeed, He does all things well.

Let us take great consolation that this one, this savior and Lord full of wonder, is ours to love and we are his to be loved; He is ours to follow because of that love lavished on his own as we are guided by his word and the Spirit. May he help us to grasp on to him tightly as our only and greatest hope.

Amen!