Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Glory of Jesus I The Infamous Rebuke of Peter, or, why Peter was not made the Pope in Matt 16.



Glory of Jesus I

Peter’s Infamous Rebuke

Matt 16:21-26

In Matthew 16:16 we find Peter’s words of settled conviction  as an answer to Jesus’ question to the disciples, But who do you say that I, the son of man, am?, Peter replied, “You are the Christ, the son of the living God.”

What is implicit in these words, is that the disciples had come to see the true nature of Jesus messianic role and identity. Jesus asked the question using the veiled messianic reference, the son of man. Peter answered using the words, “Christ” that was packed with political meaning among the population of the day and Son of God showing his origin and something of his work.

A messiah had long been expected by the religious in Israel. False messiahs had appeared many times, but the common expectation among the Jews of the first century was for a messianic figure who would prove himself to be a political liberator and power.  Even the Saducees had an idea of a physical political entity that would be ruled by Messiah forever. This liberator would throw off the cloak of all authority and lead the Jewish nation into world prominence and domination in a golden messianic age that would last forever. It would grow into a time and place of blessedness called heaven. Today, this view is called Zionism.

The Jews were not looking for a spiritual kingdom with a spiritual ethos about it--their hopes were for a material kingdom with a physical presence and dominion. Therefore, the use of the humble term son of man, was preferred by Jesus as he saw himself as the anointed messiah. Son of man was an obscure reference to the one who would fulfill the true messianic mission. The term, Christ, or anointed one had political overtones in the minds of the masses. 

It is this difference in perspective and expectation between the Jews of Jesus’ day and the true and only messiah that is at the heart of Jesus’ instruction to his disciples in Verse 20 of Matthew 16. 

[For extemporaneous exposition as to why Peter isn't the Pope based on this passage, see this message at http://www.sermonaudio.com. ]



Let’s read the text of Matt 16 from v. 20 through v. 26. Under these headings:

1. Why Silence?
2. A New Focus to the Teaching Ministry
3. Peter’s First Attempt at Binding and Loosing
4. Jesus Rebukes the Rebuker
5. The Cost of Following the Christ

Let’s read the text:

1. Why Silence?
Matt. 16:20 Then He commanded His disciples that they should tell no one that He was Jesus the Christ.

2. A New Focus to the Teaching Ministry
Matt. 16:21 From that time Jesus began to show to His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised the third day. 

3. Peter’s First Attempt at Binding and Loosing
22 Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, saying,  “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!”

4. Jesus Rebukes the Rebuker
23 But He turned and said to Peter,  “Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.”

5. The Cost of Following the Christ
Matt. 16:24 Then Jesus said to His disciples,  “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me.  25  “For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it.  26  “For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 

Let’s look at the text more closely:

1. Why Silence?
Matt. 16:20 Then He commanded His disciples that they should tell no one that He was Jesus the Christ.

Jesus did not tell his disciples to not tell because he did not know he was the anointed messiah of God. Jesus was not promoting what liberalism has called, “The Messianic Secret”. The command for silence was given because this title, Christ, would have been misunderstood.

His miracles and mission had already been misunderstood after feeding the 5,000. The multitudes wanted to make him king--on their terms, not on the terms of a true understanding of who Jesus was.

Peter had professed Jesus true identity--they had come to understand that Jesus was the Christ, and that his kingdom was vastly different that what they had once thought. They had come to know, that Jesus was THE Christ, the Son of the Living God. The confession in John 6 and Matthew 16 is devoid of the misperception common among the Jews of the first century. It is full of truth.

Since the Disciples had finally understood who Jesus was and the mission he was on, it was time to bring them deeper in their understanding of what he must do.  They knew he was the messiah and the son of the living God, but there was so much more.

Jesus accommodates this knowledge to the disciples incrementally. He brings them to a point of understanding of foundational truths, then he opens up new and necessary doctrines that are based on what he has previously said.

Therefore, here we have ....

2. A New Focus to the Teaching Ministry

There are basic elements of his future ministry and mission that Jesus is going to introduce to the disciples.

—They are:
—Travel to Jerusalem—the Holy City where the Temple was
—Suffering at the hands of the elders, chief priests and scribes
—Being Killed
—& Be Raised from the dead—a point often forgotten or lost upon the disciples.

This is what Matthew tells us as the explicit items on Jesus’ agenda as he makes these five items the main focus in his teaching ministry to the disciples. They are ready to start hearing these things. Repeat: they are ready to start hearing these things. But, if you know the Gospels, it takes them a long time for the truthfulness and the ramifications of the truth to sink in. The needed to learn about the coming work of redemption the messiah must accomplish. Many were still thinking of a material Kingdom, rather than a spiritual one.

This is what Matthew wrote:

Matt. 16:21 From that time Jesus began to show to His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised the third day. 

Jesus was just beginning to show these things to his disciples. Yet, the general theme of suffering at the hands of the Jewish leaders and about his own passion and resurrection had already been stated in a veiled manner.

Turn over to John Chapter 2 for a moment. This is where we find Jesus cleansing the temple at the beginning of his ministry. After driving out the moneychangers, he is asked a few questions. We pick up the narrative in Verse 18.  Where we have an interesting and informative contrast between the spirituality of Jesus perceptions and the physical perceptions of those who witnessed his action.

John 2:18-22 18 So the Jews answered and said to Him,  “What sign do You show to us, since You do these things?”  19 Jesus answered and said to them,  “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.”

What is Jesus talking about? What do the Jews think Jesus is talking about? Let’s read further--

20 Then the Jews said,  “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will You raise it up in three days?”

They were thinking of the physical temple. But as Verse 21 tells us,

21 But [Jesus] was speaking of the temple of His body. 

The effect of all this was future.  John adds,

22 Therefore, when He had risen from the dead, His disciples remembered that He had said this to them; and they believed the Scripture and the word which Jesus had said.

When did the disciples finally believe what Jesus had taught at the beginning of his ministry? After the resurrection, after the events occurred they looked back and said, “That’s what he meant....” The resurrection was important for many reasons.

Back in Matthew 16:21 we are told from this point onward, Jesus taught about these things. Implicitly, Jesus is teaching them that there was not going to be the grand and glorious fulfillment of the mistaken hopes of the Jews for a physical and eternal reign of the messiah on the earth. His kingdom would be pursued in a much different manner--a spiritual means to its own glorious ends.

The word must is used to show these elements are necessary in order to complete his messianic mission as it had been given to him by his Father, the Living God.

Note to the reference to going to Jerusalem. The Jewish mafia had already been sending agents to Galilee to hear what he had to say and to keep track of him. They had already sought to kill him. The only thing that kept them from acting on this was their fear of the multitudes who also went wherever Jesus went. Jesus is telling them that he must at some point return to the most hostile place on earth in order to accomplish the work he had been given to do.

Jesus was utterly committed to his mission in order to complete the work his Father had given him to do. A work that in many places and in many ways had already been revealed in prophetic utterances of old.

The Death of Jesus was fixed--it was absolutely essential to accomplish the redemption of his people.

This news was too much for at least one of the disciples--the man who had recently given the confession on which these great truths could be taught, Peter.  The narrative that follows his great confession and Jesus words about that great confession finds Peter being anything but steadfast to the words he spoke saying, You are the Christ, the son of the living God.

Look at V 22 where we have....

3. Peter’s First Attempt at Binding and Loosing
22 Then Peter took Him aside

At least Peter had the decency to make this a private matter. He took Jesus aside in order to speak with him. Look at what follows--

and began to rebuke Him,

Peter began to contradict what Jesus, the Christ, the son of the living God had said. Implicitly, Peter thought Jesus was WRONG. This word for contradict is a strong word. It means to either command or to denounce one for error or sin.

This is what Jesus did to the wind and sea when he stilled them both. This is what Jesus did to demons when he cast them out. This is what Jesus’ did to the fever when he healed Simon Peter’s mother-in-law. This is the word used when Jesus commands in order to contradict a present state of affairs and to denounce the works and workers of darkness. And, this is what Peter did to his Lord shortly after his great confession.

It is not that Peter is making a little suggestion to Jesus or asking Jesus, “Are you absolutely sure it must be this way?” No, Peter was contradicting Jesus, seeking to get him to change what must Jesus said must happen--It is an explicit denunciation of Jesus’ words of what was necessary for his divine mission.  And this is what he said....

saying,  “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!”

Peter speaks with certainty; Peter is mistaken. He says, let these things be far away from your experience Lord. One lexicon explains the language “Far be it from you, Lord” with these words: “a highly elliptical expression equivalent in meaning to the statement ‘may God be merciful to you in sparing you from having to undergo some experience’ with force: ‘God forbid it, may it not happen” The presence of both forms of the particle for “no” or “not” shows Peter could not imagine any circumstance where these things should be allowed to happen. He even uses a word from the word family of propitiation to convey the strength of his words--May God be appeased and remove this thing from you. Anyway I look at it, these things cannot be allowed to happen.

Peter is fighting against the eternal purpose and absolute necessity of the work of Christ in his life and death. He doesn’t know that, yet. But at this time he wants there to be some other way. The text says, began to rebuke him. As Jesus had begun to teach the necessity of these things, Peter sought to counteract them with equal or greater force.

Have you ever not liked something God brought to pass in your life? Have you ever grumbled at his providence? Have you ever been enraged by your situation so that you were tempted to rebuke God?

People do this all the time. They get angry at unforeseen providences that cramp their style or their schedule or that go against what they had planned. In reality, what comes to pass is the very best for our good and for God’s glory. He knows what we need. He has said all things will work together for good for those who are the Called.

But, let’s go a bit further in our probing--have you ever read your Bible and come across something you didn’t like? What did you do? Dismiss it? Think simply that can’t be true and keep on reading? As you meditate on the Word have you ever found yourself thinking or saying, Lord, this cannot be? And the only reason it cannot be is not that God hasn’t said it, but merely because you don't like it?

These comments or thoughts against God’s providences and his Word are rebukes of God at worst and murmurings and complainings at best. Either way they are sins. In my assessment, most of them are implicit rebukes of God or his servants in order for people to justify their own private interpretations. People change their understanding of God to accommodate their own errors.

The Scriptures and their interpretation is given to the Church as a corporate entity and not to any individually. Like Peter, when individuals act on their own, they are in great danger of unknowingly contradicting God. That is a dangerous place to be. And that is exactly where we find Peter in Matthew 16.  Peter is like some of us who think we know better than God. Peter thinks he knows better than God incarnate. The one he has witnessed doing marvel-filled works and speaking the wonderful words of life. The one to whom he said, “You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God.”

Jesus takes an opportunity to answer starting with some fitly spoken words.....

4. Jesus Rebukes the Real Rebuker
23 But He turned and said to Peter,  “Get behind Me, Satan!

Where there is some question in some minds about whether Peter is the “rock” or even a “rock” in an earlier narrative, there is no question here about who is called, Satan, it is Peter. And, it is not simply what Satan signifies, Jesus uses the vocative case as he views Peter as if he were Satan in the flesh before him. The meek and mild Lord, Jesus calls Peter, “Satan.”

Put yourself in Peter’s shoes. I’m sure he believed he was right, sincere and doing what he thought was the right thing to do. But, Peter was dead wrong--he had misperceived the situation and acted in undiscerning haste, again. Therefore Jesus gives the counter-rebuke, rebuking his rebuker, with the words, “Get outta here, Satan.” If you pardon my rather free translation. But, that it about the force and meaning of it.

The verb translated “Get behind me” is a command to Peter to get out of his presence.

Jesus views this situation as he did the temptation in the Wilderness back towards the start of his ministry. Turn back to Chapter 4 for a minute.

In Matt 4:1-11 we have the temptations of Jesus after he had fasted for many days. The Devil came to tempt him. Jesus rebuked him with the word of God and eventually said to him in Verse 4:10, Then Jesus said to him,  “Away with you, Satan!  It is the same verb as we find in Matthew 16:23 where Jesus commands Satan to get away from him. It is strong language that can’t be softened.

What was Peter’s problem? It seems that he picked up on the suffering and death part of the teaching, but not on the triumph of the resurrection. He became obsessed with a part of what Jesus had begun to teach and had not placed it in the context of the entirety of Jesus’ teaching.

Peter needs the benefit of the doubt. He thought he was doing what was right. But, he was dead wrong. I am sure he was concerned for truth--but in it he was guilty of great error. I am sure he was sincere, but he was sincerely wrong in his rebuke of the Lord Jesus, the Christ, the Son of the Living God.

It is not loving God with all our mind. And as they are spoken to others, they have the capacity to lead others astray. That is why it was a good thing for Peter to take Jesus aside when he sought to rebuke him.

Additionally, sincerity is not a saving grace--people can be sincere about something and sincerely wrong at the same time. Look at Mormonism, Jehovah’s Witnessism, Roman Catholicism, etc. Etc. Etc. All isms have sincere adherents who are all sincerely wrong as they pursue a salvation by works to some degree.

People like that can actually do the work of the devil as they think in their heart of hearts that they are right. There are many Peter’s in our day who refuse to bow the knee to what God has truly said as his whole counsel is taught and proclaimed. It is only made worse by the spirit of individualism present in our day.

You see, there is safety in knowing the Word of God and doing the Word of God in an unadulterated manner. It is a blessing to be taught by those God has gifted and called. Those who God will call to account for what they have taught.

Let’s get back to the text....

Jesus continues:

You are an offense to Me,

Jesus is scandalized by what Peter said and did. Peter is wrong. Peter isn’t being very steadfast and rock-solid is he?  Jesus saw Peter as having sinned against him. And by the stinging rebuke we know Jesus wants him far from him, if he is going to be like that, I should say like Satan.

Jesus continued:

for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.”

Peter came to know he was the Christ, but he was still thinking like the multitude, the scribes, the Pharisees, and the Chief Priests. He was concerned with the physical, what was seen, what he could feel with his hands or with his emotions. This left a void in his mind so that he did not have his mind full of the thoughts of God, but the concerns of men.

How many times do we take the things of God and only superficially apply them to the outward aspects of our life, when they should inform the inner man that we may be changed from glory to glory? It happens all the time.

People get concerned or obsessed with their own views on many matters, or being heard, or being right, no matter what anyone else says. Many do this with the same motivations of Peter--they are right in their own eyes, they think these things are important enough to rebuke, or to instruct others about these things while thinking themselves to be right, and they add to that the sincerity they have in doing it--but in the end, the tragedy is that they will be shown to have been like the twin rebukers Peter, and Satan, rather than like Jesus.

Being like Christ, as one of his committed followers comes with a cost. And, that cost is what some find offensive. It is a cost where we suspend our own rites on matters of faith and practice in order to take up those that are Jesus’. Thank God that he has revealed himself in the incarnate Word and since he has ascended to heaven his written Word and with that Word given teachers to the Churches to instruct with the Word of God as it “is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness...” As the Spirit says in 2 Tim 3:16.

Jesus then tells Peter and the others who were in close proximity....

5. The Cost of Following the Christ
Matt. 16:24 Then Jesus said to His disciples,  “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me.  25  “For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it.  26  “For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 

We touch upon this theme of following Jesus once again. Following Jesus does not entitle anyone to their own pride-filled private interpretation of him or the events surrounding him as Peter tried to do. Following Jesus is to be humble and to come after him, denying oneself. This is perhaps the hardest thing we are called to do as disciples. We are not on our own path to God--we are on His Straight and Narrow way. We can’t make things up as we go along--we must take his directions as our own.

You see, where pride manifests itself, we know at that point, the one with pride is not following as they ought.

We need to be taught the whole counsel of God in order to be mindful of the things of God, so that we can follow him by faith. In the great commission Jesus commands his Apostles to teach all that he had commanded. Those are the things that are to be taught to the Churches. Jesus likens discipleship to taking up one’s cross in order to follow him.

Jesus has only started teaching the disciples about his death. When these words were spoken they did not know the richness of the metaphor of taking up the cross. They did not realize at that time Jesus was telling them that following him may mean their own death in a number of ways.  

1. Their own death to their own aspirations and desires in order to take up the purposes of God in all areas of this life.

2. Their own death to their ideas about Jesus, his life and his work in order to conform their thoughts to the truth about Jesus as he revealed it.

3. Their own death as they stand committed to him, no matter what, their own death even to crucifixion on a Roman cross.

Jesus said,

25  “For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it. 

What do you desire? To assert yourself, your ideas, agenda, means to an end, rites to your own opinions and whatever you are truly sincere about? Do you stand ever-ready to rebuke God’s ways or his Word?

Or will you lay even those things at the feet of Jesus to follow him according to his Word in all humility--no matter what humans may throw at you?

Only those who lose their life for His cause will truly find it.

Jesus asks Peter two important questions:

A. 26  “For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?

B. Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 

The soul of man is the thing of greatest value to God. The answers are simple, obvious and profound:

A. 26  “For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?

It would be of no profit to acquire everything you want in this life only to discover how wrong you have been at the judgment.

B. Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 

There is nothing a man can give for his soul. He cannot even acquire all the wealth of all the nations and trade it in for his soul’s rest.

What do you value? Jesus is God’s priceless treasure. To provide security for our lost and dying souls each and every man must have faith in Jesus, who is the anointed of God, the Christ, the Son of the Living God. 

Trust in him. Listen to his gentle instruction as it is revealed in his Word and that Word as it is proclaimed from faithful pulpits. That is the means God has ordained to accomplish his abiding purpose to seek and to save the last. May these words be used even today to comfort the saints and to call sinners to repentance.

No comments:

Post a Comment